Do Emotions Result in Their Predicted Facial Expressions? A Meta- Analysis of Studies on the Co-Occurrence of Expression and Emotion
Ver/Abrir:
Identificadores:
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12226/1175Exportar referencia:
Compartir:
Estadísticas:
Ver estadísticasMetadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemFecha de publicación:
2021Resumen:
That basic emotions produce a facial signal would -if true- provide a foundation for a science of emotion. Here, random-effects meta-analyses tested whether happiness, sadness, anger, disgust, fear, and surprise each co-occurs with its predicted facial signal. The first meta-analysis examined only those studies that measured full expressions through Facial Actions Coding System (FACS). Average cooccurrence effect size was .13. The second meta-analysis included both full and partial expressions, as measured by FACS or another system. Average co-occurrence effect size rose to .23. A third meta-analysis estimated the Pearson correlation between intensity of the reported emotion and intensity of the predicted facial expression. Average correlation was .30. Overall, co-occurrence and correlation were greatest for disgust, least for surprise. What are commonly known as the six classic basic emotions do not reliably co-occur with their predicted facial signal. Heterogeneity between samples was found, suggesting a more complex account of facial expressions.
That basic emotions produce a facial signal would -if true- provide a foundation for a science of emotion. Here, random-effects meta-analyses tested whether happiness, sadness, anger, disgust, fear, and surprise each co-occurs with its predicted facial signal. The first meta-analysis examined only those studies that measured full expressions through Facial Actions Coding System (FACS). Average cooccurrence effect size was .13. The second meta-analysis included both full and partial expressions, as measured by FACS or another system. Average co-occurrence effect size rose to .23. A third meta-analysis estimated the Pearson correlation between intensity of the reported emotion and intensity of the predicted facial expression. Average correlation was .30. Overall, co-occurrence and correlation were greatest for disgust, least for surprise. What are commonly known as the six classic basic emotions do not reliably co-occur with their predicted facial signal. Heterogeneity between samples was found, suggesting a more complex account of facial expressions.
Palabra(s) clave:
facial expression
basic emotion theory
coherence
meta-analysis
Colecciones a las que pertenece:
- Artículos de revistas [712]