| dc.contributor.author | Serrano-Gómez, Luis | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gil García, Isabel Cristina | |
| dc.contributor.author | García-Cascales, M. Socorro | |
| dc.contributor.author | Fernández-Guillamón, Ana | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-01T07:10:52Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-01T07:10:52Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-06-29 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12226/2133 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In the context of isolated photovoltaic (PV) installations, selecting the optimal combination
of modules and batteries is crucial for ensuring efficient and reliable energy supply. This paper
presents a Decision Support System (DSS) designed to aid in the selection process of the development
of new PV isolated installations. Two different multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches
are employed and compared: AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) combined with TOPSIS (technique
for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution) and Entropy combined with TOPSIS. AHP
and Entropy are used to weight the technical and economic criteria considered, and TOPSIS ranks
the alternatives. A comparative analysis of the AHP + TOPSIS and Entropy + TOPSIS methods was
conducted to determine their effectiveness and applicability in real-world scenarios. The results show
that AHP and Entropy produce contrasting criteria weights, yet TOPSIS converges on similar topranked
alternatives using either set of weights, with the combination of lithium-ion batteries with the
copper indium gallium selenide PV module as optimal. AHP allows for the incorporation of expert
subjectivity, prioritising costs and an energy yield intuitive to PV projects. Entropy’s objectivity
elevates criteria with limited data variability, potentially misrepresenting their true significance.
Despite these discrepancies, this study highlights the practical implications of using structured
decision support methodologies in optimising renewable energy systems. Even though the proposed
methodology is applied to a PV isolated system, it can effectively support decision making for
optimising other stand-alone or grid-connected installations, contributing to the advancement of
sustainable energy solutions. | es |
| dc.language.iso | en | es |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ | * |
| dc.title | Improving the Selection of PV Modules and Batteries for Off-Grid PV Installations Using a Decision Support System | es |
| dc.type | article | es |
| dc.description.course | 2023-24 | es |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/info15070380 | |
| dc.issue.number | 380 | es |
| dc.journal.title | Information | es |
| dc.publisher.department | Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial | es |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Escuela de Ciencias Técnicas e Ingeniería | es |
| dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | es |
| dc.subject.keyword | isolated PV installation | es |
| dc.subject.keyword | decision support system | es |
| dc.subject.keyword | multi-criteria decision making | es |
| dc.subject.keyword | PV module selection | es |
| dc.subject.keyword | battery selection | es |
| dc.volume.number | 15 | es |