Sociodemographic Variables, Symptomatic Severity, and Therapy Attendance: A Binary Regression Model
Ver/Abrir:
Exportar referencia:
Compartir:
Estadísticas:
Ver estadísticasIndice de impacto:
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemFecha de publicación:
2024-12-21Resumen:
Over time, the concept of health has evolved, focusing more on mental well-being. Despite this, pervasive prejudices remain to hinder therapy attendance. This study aimed to identify and assess factors influencing therapy attendance and the probability associated with non-attendance. Method: The sample comprised 753 participants (46.22% men, 53.78% women) aged 18-65 (M = 33.26; SD = 12.13). The evaluation was conducted online using an evaluation protocol that included an ad hoc sociodemographic questionnaire, the List of Brief Symptoms (LSB-50), and the Social Support Survey (MOS). Results: While sex and social support showed no significance, age, symptom severity, and family history of mental health problems emerged as relevant predictors, accounting for a 30.3% probability in therapy non-attendance prediction. Conclusions: With the variables indicated, the model explains approximately 30.3% of variability. However, it would be advisable to carry out studies at the national level that allow the conclusions to be extrapolated
Over time, the concept of health has evolved, focusing more on mental well-being. Despite this, pervasive prejudices remain to hinder therapy attendance. This study aimed to identify and assess factors influencing therapy attendance and the probability associated with non-attendance. Method: The sample comprised 753 participants (46.22% men, 53.78% women) aged 18-65 (M = 33.26; SD = 12.13). The evaluation was conducted online using an evaluation protocol that included an ad hoc sociodemographic questionnaire, the List of Brief Symptoms (LSB-50), and the Social Support Survey (MOS). Results: While sex and social support showed no significance, age, symptom severity, and family history of mental health problems emerged as relevant predictors, accounting for a 30.3% probability in therapy non-attendance prediction. Conclusions: With the variables indicated, the model explains approximately 30.3% of variability. However, it would be advisable to carry out studies at the national level that allow the conclusions to be extrapolated
Palabra(s) clave:
Inasistencia
Psicoterapia
Sociodemográfico
Regresión
Colecciones a las que pertenece:
- Artículos de revistas [1304]

