Contacto

Ver ítem 
  •   udiMundus Principal
  • Investigación
  • Artículos de revistas
  • Ver ítem
  •   udiMundus Principal
  • Investigación
  • Artículos de revistas
  • Ver ítem
  • Mi cuenta
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Listar

Todo udiMundusComunidades y ColeccionesAutoresTítulosMateriasTipos documentalesEsta colecciónAutoresTítulosMateriasTipos documentales

Mi cuenta

Acceder

Estadísticas

Estadísticas de uso

Sobre el repositorio

¿Qué es udiMundus?¿Qué puedo depositar?Guía de autoarchivoAcceso abierto​Preguntas Frecuentes

Palliative care, preferences, quality of life, and informed decisions: a systematic review

Ver/Abrir:
(608.6Kb)
Identificadores:
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12226/2782
ESSN: 2660-4426
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25145/j.cuidar.2024.04.05
Exportar referencia:
Refworks
Compartir:
Estadísticas:
Ver estadísticas
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Autor(es):
Duro-Vicente, María Aranzazu; Cantero-García, María; Rueda Extremera, María; Vázquez-Martínez, Andrea
Fecha de publicación:
2025-04-11
Resumen:

Background: The increasing prevalence of cancer necessitates the expansion of palliative care. Palliative care must consider the individual preferences of patients and their participation in treatment and end-of-life decisions, respecting their wishes and autonomy. Objective: This review aims to examine patient-centered care, informed decision-making, and quality of life in palliative care. Method: The PRISMA guidelines and the PICOS framework were applied. Articles were searched during March and April 2024 in the databases using Boolean operators. The studies are quantitative, including cross-sectional, randomized, and longitudinal studies. The PEDro scale was used to assess the quality of the articles. Results: Analysis of 26 articles reveals that individual preferences are respected in palliative care, leading to patient-centered care and improved well-being, especially in outpatient palliative care. However, discrepancies arise regarding quality of life and informed decision-making. Conclusion: The importance of early referral to palliative care and further research on decision- making and quality of life is highlighted.

Background: The increasing prevalence of cancer necessitates the expansion of palliative care. Palliative care must consider the individual preferences of patients and their participation in treatment and end-of-life decisions, respecting their wishes and autonomy. Objective: This review aims to examine patient-centered care, informed decision-making, and quality of life in palliative care. Method: The PRISMA guidelines and the PICOS framework were applied. Articles were searched during March and April 2024 in the databases using Boolean operators. The studies are quantitative, including cross-sectional, randomized, and longitudinal studies. The PEDro scale was used to assess the quality of the articles. Results: Analysis of 26 articles reveals that individual preferences are respected in palliative care, leading to patient-centered care and improved well-being, especially in outpatient palliative care. However, discrepancies arise regarding quality of life and informed decision-making. Conclusion: The importance of early referral to palliative care and further research on decision- making and quality of life is highlighted.

Palabra(s) clave:

Palliative Care, Cancer, Preferences, Quality of Life, and Informed Decision- Making.

Colecciones a las que pertenece:
  • Artículos de revistas [1304]
Creative Commons El contenido de este sitio está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento – No Comercial – Sin Obra Derivada (by-nc-nd), salvo que se indique lo contrario
Logo Udima

Universidad a Distancia de Madrid

Biblioteca Hipatia

  • Facebook Udima
  • Twitter Udima
  • Youtube Udima
  • LinkedIn Udima
  • Pinterest Udima
  • Google+ Udima
  • beQbe Udima
  • Instagram Udima

www.udima.es - repositorio@udima.es

Logo DSpace