From Resource Assessment to AEP Correction: Methodological Framework for Comparing HAWT and VAWT Offshore Systems

Abstract

The rapid expansion of offshore wind energy requires exploring alternative turbine architectures capable of operating efficiently in deep waters. While horizontal-axis wind turbines (HAWTs) dominate the current market, vertical-axis wind turbines (VAWTs) offer potential advantages in wake recovery, structural integration, and scalability on floating platforms. This work proposes a methodological framework to enable a fair and reproducible comparison between the two concepts. The approach begins with site selection through spatial exclusion criteria, followed by acquisition and validation of wind data over at least one year, including long-term correction with reanalysis datasets. Technical specifications of both HAWTs and VAWTs (power curves, thrust coefficients, and rotor geometries) are compiled to build consistent turbine models. Wind resource characterization is carried out using sectoral Weibull distributions, energy roses, and vertical wind profiles. Annual energy production (AEP) for HAWTs is estimated with WAsP, while VAWT performance requires geometric normalization to a common top-tip height and subsequent correction factors for air density, turbulence sensitivity, and wake recovery. Case studies demonstrate that corrected AEP values for VAWTs may exceed baseline WAsP estimates by 6–20%, narrowing the performance gap with HAWTs. The framework highlights uncertainties in wake modeling and calls for dedicated computational fluid dynamics (CFD) validation and pilot projects to confirm large-scale VAWT viability.