Contacto

Ver ítem 
  •   udiMundus Principal
  • Investigación
  • Artículos de revistas
  • Ver ítem
  •   udiMundus Principal
  • Investigación
  • Artículos de revistas
  • Ver ítem
  • Mi cuenta
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Listar

Todo udiMundusComunidades y ColeccionesAutoresTítulosMateriasTipos documentalesEsta colecciónAutoresTítulosMateriasTipos documentales

Mi cuenta

Acceder

Estadísticas

Estadísticas de uso

Sobre el repositorio

¿Qué es udiMundus?¿Qué puedo depositar?Guía de autoarchivoAcceso abierto​Preguntas Frecuentes

Impact of psychosocial support interventions for informal caregivers of palliative care patients: a systematic review

Ver/Abrir:
(413.7Kb)
Identificadores:
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12226/3327
ISSN: 1988-8287
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/psic.108432
Exportar referencia:
Refworks
Compartir:
Estadísticas:
Ver estadísticas
Indice de impacto:
SJR: Q4
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Autor(es):
Amorós-Gracia, Elisabeth; Rueda Extremera, María; Cantero-García, María
Fecha de publicación:
2026-04-20
Resumen:

Background: Informal caregivers of patients in advanced or terminal stages of illness frequently experience high psychosocial burden, including anxiety, depressive symptoms, and reduced quality of life. Although family support is a core component of palliative care, psychosocial interventions specifically targeting informal caregivers remain limited. Aim: To systematically review the impact of psychosocial support interventions delivered to informal caregivers of adult palliative care patients on emotional outcomes, caregiver burden, and quality of life, and to synthesize caregivers’ perceptions and experiences of the support received. Method: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020. Searches were performed in ProQuest, PubMed, Web of Science, and PubMed Central for studies published in English or Spanish between 2014 and 2024. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies evaluating psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers or providing them with structured access to psychosocial support were included. Results: Ten studies met inclusion criteria. Multicomponent interventions—particularly those addressing the patient–caregiver dyad or integrating caregivers into patient-centered programs—showed favorable effects on depressive symptoms, anxiety, caregiver burden, and/or quality of life. Caregivers reported emotional validation, improved coping strategies, and a sense of support. Remote delivery formats (telephone, online platforms) were feasible and acceptable. Conclusions: Psychosocial interventions that actively involve informal caregivers are associated with meaningful benefits and positive subjective experiences. Future research should prioritize methodologically robust designs and explicitly address grief and bereavement when relevant.

Background: Informal caregivers of patients in advanced or terminal stages of illness frequently experience high psychosocial burden, including anxiety, depressive symptoms, and reduced quality of life. Although family support is a core component of palliative care, psychosocial interventions specifically targeting informal caregivers remain limited. Aim: To systematically review the impact of psychosocial support interventions delivered to informal caregivers of adult palliative care patients on emotional outcomes, caregiver burden, and quality of life, and to synthesize caregivers’ perceptions and experiences of the support received. Method: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020. Searches were performed in ProQuest, PubMed, Web of Science, and PubMed Central for studies published in English or Spanish between 2014 and 2024. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies evaluating psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers or providing them with structured access to psychosocial support were included. Results: Ten studies met inclusion criteria. Multicomponent interventions—particularly those addressing the patient–caregiver dyad or integrating caregivers into patient-centered programs—showed favorable effects on depressive symptoms, anxiety, caregiver burden, and/or quality of life. Caregivers reported emotional validation, improved coping strategies, and a sense of support. Remote delivery formats (telephone, online platforms) were feasible and acceptable. Conclusions: Psychosocial interventions that actively involve informal caregivers are associated with meaningful benefits and positive subjective experiences. Future research should prioritize methodologically robust designs and explicitly address grief and bereavement when relevant.

Palabra(s) clave:

Palliative care, caregivers, family members, psychosocial intervention, terminal care.

Colecciones a las que pertenece:
  • Artículos de revistas [1293]
Creative Commons El contenido de este sitio está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento – No Comercial – Sin Obra Derivada (by-nc-nd), salvo que se indique lo contrario
Logo Udima

Universidad a Distancia de Madrid

Biblioteca Hipatia

  • Facebook Udima
  • Twitter Udima
  • Youtube Udima
  • LinkedIn Udima
  • Pinterest Udima
  • Google+ Udima
  • beQbe Udima
  • Instagram Udima

www.udima.es - repositorio@udima.es

Logo DSpace