Contacto

Ver ítem 
  •   udiMundus Principal
  • Investigación
  • Libros y capítulos de libros
  • Ver ítem
  •   udiMundus Principal
  • Investigación
  • Libros y capítulos de libros
  • Ver ítem
  • Mi cuenta
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Listar

Todo udiMundusComunidades y ColeccionesAutoresTítulosMateriasTipos documentalesEsta colecciónAutoresTítulosMateriasTipos documentales

Mi cuenta

Acceder

Estadísticas

Estadísticas de uso

Sobre el repositorio

¿Qué es udiMundus?¿Qué puedo depositar?Guía de autoarchivoAcceso abierto​Preguntas Frecuentes

Language models as function approximators of text data: disrupting comprehension through and adversarial attack

Ver/Abrir:
(2.505Mb)
Identificadores:
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12226/3351
ISBN: 979-8-8819-0379-4
Exportar referencia:
Refworks
Compartir:
Estadísticas:
Ver estadísticas
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Autor(es):
Lobina Bona, David James
Fecha de publicación:
2026-03
Resumen:

Large Language Models such as ChatGPT are examples of Machine Learning models (ML), and as such, they are best regarded as “function approximators,” or vast correlation machines. That is, given a dataset, however big, of pairs of inputs and outputs, a ML network will construct a function that best describes (approximates) the distribution in the data, and from whence it can generate similar input-output pairs if prompted. In the case of ChatGPT, the dataset is composed of text—the products of the language faculty. In this sense, ChatGPT does not model a natural language per se, but the statistical distribution of text, the latter treated as recorded, static data. A fortiori, the claim that some of the results emanating from the development of Large Language Models bear any consequence for the study of language, especially regarding linguistic competence and acquisitional studies, appear to be the case of committing a category mistake.

Large Language Models such as ChatGPT are examples of Machine Learning models (ML), and as such, they are best regarded as “function approximators,” or vast correlation machines. That is, given a dataset, however big, of pairs of inputs and outputs, a ML network will construct a function that best describes (approximates) the distribution in the data, and from whence it can generate similar input-output pairs if prompted. In the case of ChatGPT, the dataset is composed of text—the products of the language faculty. In this sense, ChatGPT does not model a natural language per se, but the statistical distribution of text, the latter treated as recorded, static data. A fortiori, the claim that some of the results emanating from the development of Large Language Models bear any consequence for the study of language, especially regarding linguistic competence and acquisitional studies, appear to be the case of committing a category mistake.

Palabra(s) clave:

Knowledge of language, Linguistic Theory, Large Language Models, Artificial Intelligence

Colecciones a las que pertenece:
  • Libros y capítulos de libros [699]
Creative Commons El contenido de este sitio está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento – No Comercial – Sin Obra Derivada (by-nc-nd), salvo que se indique lo contrario
Logo Udima

Universidad a Distancia de Madrid

Biblioteca Hipatia

  • Facebook Udima
  • Twitter Udima
  • Youtube Udima
  • LinkedIn Udima
  • Pinterest Udima
  • Google+ Udima
  • beQbe Udima
  • Instagram Udima

www.udima.es - repositorio@udima.es

Logo DSpace