Contacto

Ver ítem 
  •   udiMundus Principal
  • Investigación
  • Artículos de revistas
  • Ver ítem
  •   udiMundus Principal
  • Investigación
  • Artículos de revistas
  • Ver ítem
  • Mi cuenta
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Listar

Todo udiMundusComunidades y ColeccionesAutoresTítulosMateriasTipos documentalesEsta colecciónAutoresTítulosMateriasTipos documentales

Mi cuenta

Acceder

Estadísticas

Estadísticas de uso

Sobre el repositorio

¿Qué es udiMundus?¿Qué puedo depositar?Guía de autoarchivoAcceso abierto​Preguntas Frecuentes

A hippocampal vascular–glymphatic model of brain maintenance and cognitive resilience in Alzheimer's disease and post-stroke dementia

Ver/Abrir:
(1016.Kb)
Identificadores:
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12226/3541
ISSN: 1387-2877
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877261483191
Exportar referencia:
Refworks
Compartir:
Estadísticas:
Ver estadísticas
Indice de impacto:
JCR: Q2
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Autor(es):
Ruiz-García, Álvaro; Díaz-Benito, Blanca; Muñoz-García, Mariana
Fecha de publicación:
2026-08-30
Resumen:

Individuals with comparable burdens of brain pathology often follow markedly different cognitive trajectories. This heterogeneity is captured by three partly dissociable constructs—brain reserve, cognitive reserve, and brain maintenance—here grouped under the superordinate term cognitive resilience. Cognitive reserve has traditionally been indexed by education, occupational complexity, and lifelong cognitive engagement, yet its biological substrates remain incompletely defined. We propose that hippocampal vascular supply and perivascular (glymphatic) and meningeal lymphatic clearance, modulated by blood–brain barrier integrity and neuroinflammatory tone, constitute one biological substrate of resilience. We make its conceptual placement explicit: these processes operate predominantly as substrates of brain maintenance (efficient clearance limiting amyloid-β and tau accumulation) and brain reserve (a redundant hippocampal arterial supply buffering partial vascular compromise), rather than of cognitive reserve sensu stricto. We hypothesize, as an inference requiring direct testing rather than an established mechanism, that vascular architecture and clearance capacity are mechanistically coupled through perfusion and arterial pulsatility, rather than acting as independent parallel contributors. Preserved blood–brain barrier integrity and a regulated neuroinflammatory tone are proposed to sustain this axis, whereas their disruption, through astrocytic aquaporin-4 mislocalization, microglial activation, and barrier breakdown, accelerates cognitive decline. We additionally outline one speculative pathway by which cerebral perfusion may contribute directly to cognitive reserve. Consistent with a Hypothesis article, the model is framed as a small set of constrained, falsifiable predictions—distinguishing established, inferred, and speculative links—and as a research roadmap for Alzheimer's disease and post-stroke dementia, identifying modifiable targets (cerebral perfusion, sleep, vascular risk control) and reframing cognitive resilience as biologically grounded and potentially actionable.

Individuals with comparable burdens of brain pathology often follow markedly different cognitive trajectories. This heterogeneity is captured by three partly dissociable constructs—brain reserve, cognitive reserve, and brain maintenance—here grouped under the superordinate term cognitive resilience. Cognitive reserve has traditionally been indexed by education, occupational complexity, and lifelong cognitive engagement, yet its biological substrates remain incompletely defined. We propose that hippocampal vascular supply and perivascular (glymphatic) and meningeal lymphatic clearance, modulated by blood–brain barrier integrity and neuroinflammatory tone, constitute one biological substrate of resilience. We make its conceptual placement explicit: these processes operate predominantly as substrates of brain maintenance (efficient clearance limiting amyloid-β and tau accumulation) and brain reserve (a redundant hippocampal arterial supply buffering partial vascular compromise), rather than of cognitive reserve sensu stricto. We hypothesize, as an inference requiring direct testing rather than an established mechanism, that vascular architecture and clearance capacity are mechanistically coupled through perfusion and arterial pulsatility, rather than acting as independent parallel contributors. Preserved blood–brain barrier integrity and a regulated neuroinflammatory tone are proposed to sustain this axis, whereas their disruption, through astrocytic aquaporin-4 mislocalization, microglial activation, and barrier breakdown, accelerates cognitive decline. We additionally outline one speculative pathway by which cerebral perfusion may contribute directly to cognitive reserve. Consistent with a Hypothesis article, the model is framed as a small set of constrained, falsifiable predictions—distinguishing established, inferred, and speculative links—and as a research roadmap for Alzheimer's disease and post-stroke dementia, identifying modifiable targets (cerebral perfusion, sleep, vascular risk control) and reframing cognitive resilience as biologically grounded and potentially actionable.

Colecciones a las que pertenece:
  • Artículos de revistas [1410]
Creative Commons El contenido de este sitio está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento – No Comercial – Sin Obra Derivada (by-nc-nd), salvo que se indique lo contrario
Logo Udima

Universidad a Distancia de Madrid

Biblioteca Hipatia

  • Facebook Udima
  • Twitter Udima
  • Youtube Udima
  • LinkedIn Udima
  • Pinterest Udima
  • Google+ Udima
  • beQbe Udima
  • Instagram Udima

www.udima.es - repositorio@udima.es

Logo DSpace