dc.contributor.authorSerrano Gómez, Luis
dc.contributor.authorTurpin-Ramos, Ángel
dc.contributor.authorGil García, Isabel Cristina
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Guillamón, Ana
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-04T07:26:20Z
dc.date.available2026-09-04T07:26:20Z
dc.date.issued2026-09-01
dc.identifier.issn1999-4893
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12226/3560
dc.description.abstractThe transition toward renewable energy in agricultural pumping requires robust decision-making tools capable of addressing multiple, often conflicting criteria. This study investigates the respective contributions of fuzzy weighting and fuzzy ranking within AHP–TOPSIS frameworks for photovoltaic (PV) self-consumption planning in agricultural pumping applications. Unlike conventional MCDM applications that focus on identifying a preferred alternative using a single classical or fuzzy formulation, this study systematically isolates the effects of fuzziness at the weighting and ranking stages. Four methodological configurations are comparatively analyzed: classical AHP–TOPSIS, fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS with fuzzy weighting, AHP–TOPSIS with fuzzy ranking, and a fully fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS approach incorporating both fuzzy weighting and fuzzy ranking. Triangular fuzzy numbers are employed to represent the vagueness and subjectivity inherent in expert judgments, which are commonly expressed using quantitative scales despite their imprecise nature. A real-world case study involving the planning of a self-consumption PV installation for an agricultural pumping system in southeastern Spain is used to assess and compare the four approaches. The results distinguish the effects of fuzzy weighting and fuzzy ranking on both criteria weights and alternative rankings, showing whether the differences between classical and fuzzy formulations arise primarily from the weighting stage, the ranking stage, or their combined application. Rather than assuming that fuzzy formulations provide universally superior results, the analysis identifies the specific circumstances and stages in which fuzzy modelling produces meaningful changes in the decision outcome. The findings contribute to sustainable energy planning by providing a systematic framework for PV self-consumption planning in agricultural pumping under uncertain and subjective decision environments.es
dc.language.isoenes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleDisentangling Fuzzy Weighting and Fuzzy Ranking in AHP–TOPSIS: A Comparative Study of PV Self-Consumption Planning for Agricultural Pumpinges
dc.typearticlees
dc.description.course2025-26es
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/a19090732
dc.issue.number9es
dc.journal.titleAlgorithmses
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Ingeniería Industriales
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias de la Empresa y la Tecnologíaes
dc.publisher.group(GI-25/9) Políticas Públicas e Innovación Tecnológica en la Unión Europea para una Industria Sostenible, Digital y Competitiva. (EU-INDTECH)es
dc.relation.projectIDPID2024-157436OB-C22es
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.subject.keywordmulti-criteria decision-making; fuzzy AHP; fuzzy TOPSIS; photovoltaic systems; self-consumption; agricultural pumping; renewable energy; uncertainty; expert judgmentes
dc.volume.number19es
dc.indice.jcrQ2


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional